We check your site against 150+ parameters: Core Web Vitals, indexation, Schema.org markup, URL structure, internal links. You get a report with a concrete action plan — not a list of generic recommendations.
A technical audit is a systematic diagnostic of your website that uncovers everything preventing Google from properly crawling, indexing and ranking your pages. Without an audit, SEO is like treating symptoms without a diagnosis — work gets done but results don't come.
We check your site the same way Google's crawler does — from technical configuration to the content structure of every page.
Every issue found gets a description, severity rating and a specific fix recommendation — no generic advice, no guesswork.
Sites that implement audit recommendations typically see 2–3× organic traffic growth within the first four months.
The audit covers every layer of your site — from server configuration to Schema.org markup quality on individual pages.
An audit isn't an automated Screaming Frog export. It's a manual interpretation of data by people who understand how Google actually evaluates sites.
We run a full technical crawl using Screaming Frog and Ahrefs. At the same time we connect Google Search Console and GA4 — so we can see not just technical issues but their actual impact on traffic and rankings. GSC data shows which pages Google is already indexing and which ones it ignores, and why.
| Status | URL count | Issue |
|---|---|---|
| ❌ Error | 47 | Blocked by robots.txt |
| ❌ Error | 23 | Not found (404) |
| ⚠ Warning | 134 | Indexed but not in sitemap |
| ⚠ Warning | 89 | Duplicate content |
| ✓ Indexed | 612 | Correct |
We analyse every technical parameter that affects ranking. Special attention goes to Core Web Vitals — Google has used them as a ranking signal since 2021. A slow LCP or unstable CLS can cost you dozens of positions even with great content.
We check meta tag and heading quality across every page: uniqueness, search intent alignment, presence of target queries. Schema.org gets a separate audit — properly configured markup improves CTR in search results through rich snippets without changing your rankings at all.
All found issues are compiled into a structured report with priority levels: critical — fix immediately, important — within the first month, recommended — for ongoing development. Every issue comes with a specific fix instruction. Your developer knows exactly what to do next without follow-up questions.
The audit found 847 technical issues. Critical: missing canonical on 412 pages and LCP of 6.8s. After fixes and Product Schema implementation, traffic grew 5.8×.
Aesthetic medicine clinic. Audit found no MedicalOrganization Schema and 140 pages without H1. After implementation — TOP-5 for 60+ queries in 4 months.
B2B platform. Audit revealed content duplication across 200+ pages and missing FAQPage Schema. After fixes, organic traffic exceeded PPC in lead volume.
Leave your number — we'll get back to you within 2 hours with an honest assessment of your project.
A technical website audit is a thorough examination of how Google's crawler sees, reads and evaluates your site. Unlike SEO optimisation, which adds new value, a website audit first removes obstacles: technical errors, incorrect settings, indexation problems that undermine every other effort you make on your site.
A telling example: a site with genuinely good content and an active link-building campaign was stuck on position 15 and hadn't moved for eight months. The audit found that 34% of pages had duplicate title tags, and category pages had been blocked by a noindex directive left over from development. Two fixes later, the site entered the TOP-5 for 40+ queries within a week.
Most site owners order SEO and wait for results. After four to six months of modest growth — or no movement at all — they switch to a different agency. That agency starts from scratch and the pattern repeats. In most cases the underlying cause is the same: a proper technical website audit was never done before any work started.
Without an audit, your SEO agency writes content for pages Google isn't even indexing. Builds links to a domain with broken hreflang. Optimises meta tags on pages that duplicate each other. We see all three of these situations in over half of new clients who come to us after working with other agencies.
For most sites — at least every six months. Google regularly updates its algorithms and technical requirements. What was perfectly acceptable a year ago (for instance, the shift from FID to INP in Core Web Vitals) can become a ranking liability today. For active e-commerce sites with frequent catalogue changes — quarterly, or after every major site update.
We'll check your site against 150+ parameters and prepare a prioritised plan for fixing the issues found.